|
Linda Thomas AICI CIP designs and delivers
“Image Awareness”
programs throughout corporate America. Linda earned the credentials
of Certified Image Professional through the Association of
Image Consultants International, is an award winning member
of the National Speakers Association of North Texas and a
published author.
|

The Hosiery Dilemma
WOW! It’s hot outside, and that’s the naked truth!
It’s summertime, and the living is easy. At least some
employers are trying to make it easier, by allowing
their female employees to come to work without hosiery. Usually,
this is considered a perk. As we shall see, however, the facts
of the matter leave us with barely a leg to stand on!
For several reasons, the image presented by a woman with
no hosiery can be inappropriate for the workplace and may
lead to problems there. For instance, when “given an
inch”, sometimes the unfortunate tendency among workers
is to “take a mile”. Once an employer permits
a relaxation of the company’s dress code in one area,
employees may assume that they have their boss’s tacit
approval to make comparable adjustments throughout their wardrobe.
Soon, the company’s dress code will have faded into
the mists of memory, a relic of bygone days.
During warmer weather, women may elect not only to leave
their hosiery at home, but also to arrive at the office in
short skirts, sundresses, and other types of casual clothing
that generally reveal more skin. This casual, more revealing
clothing can make a woman appear less-than-serious about her
career, or frivolous about her professional goals within the
company. Studies have shown that women who dress in this manner
at work earn less money and are taken less seriously than
their male counterparts who dress more traditionally. The
woman who dresses too casually at the office relinquishes
her business power to her male colleagues who are clad in
polo shirts, slacks, and loafers with socks. While their attire
may be equally casual, the men’s clothing reveals less
skin, allowing them to retain some level of personal comfort
while maintaining their professional image.
Additionally, the more revealing attire may make an unwanted
“provocative” impression on male managers, particularly
those who are older and may have more conservative tastes.
Leaving a male manager with this type of impression may be
the last thing that a female employee intends to
do. Nevertheless, she must remain mindful of the potential
for misinterpretation.
Many women find it quite a challenge to present attractive
legs and feet without benefit of hosiery. If you decide to
report to work without hosiery, please take the time to properly
prepare for it! Ensure that your legs are carefully waxed,
thoroughly moisturized, and evenly tanned. Apply fresh polish
to toenails. Smooth out rough heels and soles (using a pumice
stone, if necessary). Always wear sandals that fit your feet
perfectly.
An attractive lady with a flat stomach, nice legs, and a
deep tan should have fun showing off her
figure! Those short skirts and navel-revealing midriff tops
are perfect for social outings or weekend activities. But,
they seldom work at work! At the office, the female employee
is more likely to enhance her career by paying attention to
the company’s figures rather than her own. The only
statement that her clothes should be making is, “I’m
here to work.” Simply put, the more skin a woman reveals
in the workplace, the fewer promotions, salary increases,
and other benefits she reasonably can expect.
In summary, here are the Top
10 reasons why too-casual clothing may be perceived as provocative
or questionable ~ and therefore should be considered
inappropriate for the workplace:
10. Embarrassing situations ~ or even
sexual harassment cases ~ may become more prevalent.
9. Human Resources may be forced to act
as the Fashion Police, sending employees home for dress
code violations. This could lead to decreased office productivity.
8. Discussions of wardrobe concerns between
managers (particularly males) and employees (particularly
females) may cause anger and resentment among staff.
7. Lax dress codes could lead to lax
behavior and/or manners among employees.
6. Current and/or prospective clients
(particularly visitors from abroad) may perceive the too-casual
clothing as a lack of respect for the company’s brand.
This could lead to a loss of business and/or revenue.
5. One’s own colleagues may misinterpret
the message one sends when wearing inappropriate clothing
to the office.
4. Class and age differences may become
more apparent, resulting in interpersonal conflicts.
3. Certain employees (particularly those
who are “differently advantaged”) may appear
less capable and/or powerful.
2. Managers may assume (correctly or
otherwise) that an employee’s too-casual clothing
indicates a too-casual attitude toward his or her job responsibilities.
This assumption could result in closer supervision (sometimes
referred to as “micromanagement”) and more frequent
performance reviews.
AND THE #1 REASON THAT TOO-CASUAL CLOTHING SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE WORKPLACE:
1. More skin revealed equals less
money earned!
The bottom line is this:
the “perquisite” of too-casual clothing ultimately
may cost both managers and employees a great deal of time,
money, and other resources. Here are some solutions that have
been implemented successfully by U.S. companies:
-
The company announces a move to upgrade its image and
atmosphere on all levels (such as dress code, environment,
public relations, and marketing) in order to polish the
company’s brand.
-
Mentors are appointed to offer guidance in the area of
“image investment”. Younger employees learn
to dress in a manner that reflects their professional
goals, modeling their wardrobe on that of their mentor.
They appear at work dressed more appropriately, regardless
of the weather or the time of year.
-
Full-length mirrors are installed in all of the employees’
restrooms.
-
Dress code examples, with detailed illustrations, are
printed in the company’s employee policy manual,
ensuring that all employees are informed as to the types
of clothing that are considered acceptable, as well as
those that are not. Additionally, these
images may appear on the company’s website. Posters
or life-size cardboard cutouts may even be displayed in
employee common areas, thus reinforcing the Do’s
and Don’ts of workplace attire.
-
Clear guidelines are established, ensuring that all employees
are aware of the consequences of arriving at work dressed
inappropriately. (For example, an individual may be sent
home to change his or her clothes.)
-
A local department or clothing store arranges to sponsor
a “fashion show” and offers discounts to employees.
-
Monthly E-mail suggestions on ways to maintain a professional
image in the workplace (including corresponding visuals)
are sent to all employees.
-
A “clothing drive” is organized. Employees
clean out their closets, removing all articles of clothing
that no longer are being worn. (There may be various reasons
for this. Perhaps the items do not fit, are outdated,
are faded, are in bad repair, or create unpleasant memories.)
For whatever reason, all unused clothing is removed from
the closet, discarded, and donated to local charities.
-
Monthly tele-seminars are held. These mini-courses provide
specific dress code pointers, helping employees acquire
confidence in such subjects as shopping on a budget, organizing
one’s closet, discerning differences between Weekend
Casual and Business Casual, and defining one’s body
shape (and learning to dress accordingly).
- A Train-the-Trainer program is established. The company
has a reference manual published for use by in-house trainers
when instructing employees on the ways in which their professional
image can be adjusted to complement and positively reflect
the company’s brand.
The Hosiery Dilemma
| Not Wearing
Hosiery |
Wearing Hosiery |
| Sends a casual message in the workplace. |
Makes a professional impression at
work. |
| Requires time-consuming and expensive preparation. |
Provides a quick, inexpensive solution. |
| Legs MUST have a deep, even suntan.
|
Instantly provides a “tanned”
appearance. |
| Skin tone MUST appear perfectly smooth ~ free of ANY
blotches or blemishes. |
Helps to “smooth out” the appearance of
pale, blotchy, or uneven skin tones. |
| Legs and feet MUST be moisturized.
|
Makes dry skin less noticeable. |
| Legs must be waxed WEEKLY or shaved DAILY. (Shaving
leaves an appearance of “stubble” after only
24 hours!) |
Slight “stubble” is camouflaged. |
| Provides NO support for legs with
varicose or “spider” veins. |
Support hose will protect legs and
prevent additional damage from broken veins. |
Pedicure MUST be kept current.
Nails MUST be freshly polished. |
Toes are invisible in pumps or sling-backs. |
| Heels and soles MUST be kept moisturized
and smooth. If necessary, a pumice stone should be used
on feet to prevent a cracked, crusty, rough appearance. |
Pumps keep heels and soles invisible. |
| Bare feet with bunions, damaged toenails, corns, hammertoes,
extra long toes, blue veins, or injuries are frequently
distracting. |
Unsightly feet are hidden and therefore create no distractions.
|
| Unnecessarily emphasizes the legs
and feet, minimizing the effect of “continuity”.
|
Creates a streamlined appearance. |
| Requires the wearing of open-toe sandals
or back-less mules to prevent damage from body heat and
perspiration*. |
Hose absorb moisture from body heat and perspiration
(which naturally gravitate to our shoes) … slowing
damage to footwear. |
* Sandals should fit the feet perfectly.
Toes should neither extend over the edges nor should they
touch the ground. Heels should not spill over the back of
the sandals. There must be no pudginess between straps ~ either
at the toe or along the straps of the sandals. |